| |
| Most other painters in the 1950s felt more
attracted to the much more severe forms and colours of expressionism.
There were also, as Theo Wolvecamp, which Foltz new avenues that would
lead to experimental and abstract art. Jan van der Leest so painted
figurative. He tried portrait, figure and still life, but the best lag
the landscape in all its manifestations-forms him. He found his motives
initially especially in the immediate environment. The Woods and fields
around Hengelo, all kinds of Nooks in the (bombed and so not really "pretty")
city and everything that had to do with the railways. A railway
embankment, a station, a train in the distance. And thus we come to the
legs truck. Jan had to do everything on foot at that time, while he
yearned for new landscapes, new cities, new images. There the background
from which the large amount of paintings and drawings on the theme of
railways in the oeuvre of Jan van der Leest declaring the restrictive
character of the legs is: truck.Who can see the paintings now sympathize
of the promise that something went hiding in the rail network of the
1950s. Cars there were not so many and the roads left to be desired, but
the track! When the war damage was repaired, the world open again. The
feeling to have the freedom to make use of them. |
| |
 |
|
Each painting of a
railway embankment or train station, feelings of desire in itself.
shackle Jan van der Leest paints that desire with a dreamy palette in a
mysterious atmosphere. The railway historian is probably little wiser of
these paintings. It is really the experience: the space that opens up,
the freedom that allows itself to be aware of. One can this railway
paintings consider as a separate form of landscape art. Not only the
landscape and its features made by man are commonplace, also the
possibility to travel through the landscape is suggested. In other words:
the painter gives the viewer a push in the direction of their own
imagination. |
| |
| He seems to
encourage the Viewer to go on journey through the landscape and self to
figure out what comes afterwards, what lies behind the horizon. Trains,
rail stations and levees already existed a hundred years and it would be
foolish to assume that given that escaped to the attention of the
painting would be. So there are more paintings around this theme. The
best known are undoubtedly of the hand of Claude Monet, the famous
French painter to whom we owe the impressionism. Because Jan van der
Leest barely trained and was also at that time were not as many
colors-reproductions, he has that work probably initially not known. Jan
van der Leest paints that desire with a dreamy palette in a mysterious
atmosphere. The railway historian is probably little wiser of these
paintings. It is really the experience: the space that opens up, the
freedom that allows itself to be aware of. One can this railway
paintings consider as a separate form of landscape art. Not only the
landscape and its features made by man are commonplace, also the
possibility to travel through the landscape is suggested. |
| |
| In other words:
the painter gives the viewer a push in the direction of their own
imagination. He seems to encourage the Viewer to go on journey through
the landscape and self to figure out what comes afterwards, what lies
behind the horizon.Trains, rail stations and levees already existed a
hundred years and it would be foolish to assume that given that escaped
to the attention of the painting would be. So there are more paintings
around this theme. The best known are undoubtedly of the hand of Claude
Monet, the famous French painter to whom we owe the impressionism. |
|
 |
| |
| Because Jan van
der Leest barely trained and was also at that time, he has not so many
colors that were probably initially work reproductions are not known. In
any case, he recognized that work not from direct observation. This is
shown by the story that Theo Wolvecamp told after they had been to Paris
together. There they found in a museum that famous painting Gare Saint
Lazare of Monet, showing how precisely a train steaming and puffing the
great glides into stationsoverkapping. When Jan saw it he must continue
his three-quarters of an hour watching and then sigh with grief at: "this
painting I had 15 years earlier should see". It was him an absolute
revelation! Of course, we need this kind of anecdotes, who still until
far after his death by his friends to be told, take with a grain of salt.
But still.An artist is in principle only with his canvas, paints and
brushes. Jan sketched, and sometimes he put his ass outside on a little
square and then worked in the limelight of the casual passer-by, but
also his work came broadly in the privacy and solitude of the atelier
tapped. |
| |
 |
|
If the work than
on an exhibition at the publicity given price, makes it suddenly part of
the art production of ages. A skilled artist has taught at the Academy
to relate to that total and has its position in the big picture learning.
Jan van der Leest was self-taught. He had learned and what he himself
the box that large sum of the art and art history, knew he had gained
through conversations with other artists, such as The Wolvecamp, Holtrop,
Bob Stork-Riemko Damen and Fritz Spitz, which had had the opportunity to
literally and figuratively to look beyond just their own atelier. Jan
had to do with highly fragmented knowledge. |
| |
| Now it is so that
every artist should of course also stretched its possibilities and
limitations. Jan has certainly done that admirably. He has extensive
work in the craft. He has also deepened in forms of experiment,
especially in the area of graphical techniques.He has traveled as much
as he could. He has landscapes and cityscapes in various provinces of
our country, in Switzerland, Germany, Belgium and France, drawn and
painted with attention and love viewed. If he talks about his work,
according to various interviews, he gives that evokes the emotion that
the place for him, lies mainly in the atmosphere to capture this decided
emotion to the Viewer. To speak by the paint, letting the light and the
colors to make it work as setting him succeed time and time again to
catch a special atmosphere. So you can say that he is, literally and figuratively,
in the absence of other transportation, he went cheerfully and passionately on his way. |
| |
|